精选试卷> 学历类> 自考专业(英语)> 英语科技文选> 2016年自考专业(英语)英语科技文选考试真题及答案

2016年自考专业(英语)英语科技文选考试真题及答案

来源: 上学吧自考专业(英语)题库发布时间:2021-11-17

自考英语是指参加全国高等教育自学英语专业的考试,主要是培养具有扎实的英语语言基础和比较广泛的科学文化知识,能在外事、经贸、文化、新闻出版、教育、科研、旅游等部门从事翻译、研究、教学、管理工作的英语高级专门人才。上学吧自考英语题库是专门为自考英语专业的考生提供刷题服务的,相信考生在不断地坚持刷题练习中定会有所收获。现在就点击安装APP刷题。以下为试卷的详细内容:

一、阅读理解题Directions: Read through the following passages. Choose the best answer and put the letter in the bracket. (20%)参考答案见试卷末尾

1、(A) As the Ebola outbreak simmers on in West Africa, researchers have shown the utility of a rapid test for the virus that could help contain another epidemic. The ReEBOV test, which needs only a fingerprick of blood and gives results in about 15 minutes, was granted Emergency Use Authorization by WHO in February, based on laboratory assessments. Throughout the recent Ebola outbreak, clinicians have relied on PCR-based tests to diagnose cases of the viral disease. The tests require a full vial of blood to be drawn from a patient’s arm and transported to the nearest laboratory facility—which can take hours or days. In the lab, over the course of several hours, a PCR machine amplifies the genetic material in the blood until there is a sufficient amount to detect. In all, the process can take a few days—during which time a patient suspected of carrying Ebola must be quarantined or housed in holding units where they are at risk of infection. The newer ReEBOV test, currently manufactured by Colorado-based Corgenix, is like the fingerprick tests used by diabetics to test their blood sugar. Within a few minutes after a drop of blood is placed on a paper strip, a line appears signaling a positive or negative result. Unlike PCR-based tests, which look for the presence of the virus’s genetic material, the ReEBOV test detects antigens: proteins made by the body in response to an Ebola infection. Over a 2-week span in February, researchers used both the ReEBOV test and a classic PCR-based test on 106 patients who showed up at two clinics in Sierra Leone with suspected Ebola symptoms. In addition, the scientists compared the tests’ performances on 284 previously collected blood samples. The ReEBOV antigen test detected every case of Ebola that was diagnosed using the slower PCR-based test, giving it what the researchers believed was a sensitivity of 100%. The test also had a handful of false positives, however, making its specificity 92%. “We were surprised by the performance,” says Nira Pollock, an infectious disease doctor at Boston Children’s Hospital and an author of the new study. “It was more sensitive than I expected for a rapid antigen diagnostic test.” But Pollock admits the numbers may be misleading. After the collection of the initial data, the scientists used a second PCR-based test lo look at some of the samples. The PCR test they’d been using as a “gold standard,” it turned out. wasn’t itself 100% sensitive, not only highlighting the discrepancy between different PCR-based tests but also casting doubts on their new results. In retrospect, “we think we probably overestimated the sensitivity and underestimated the specificity,” Pollock says. More data are needed to illuminate these numbers, she adds. A fast, cheap, transportable Ebola test can’t come too soon, researchers say. “This test can be done in very austere environments, even off the back of a truck; it doesn’t require electricity or a sophisticated lab or an experienced technician.”points out Robert Garry, a virologist at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana, who helped develop the technology the test is based on but was not involved in the new trial.What is the passage mainly concerned with?

A.The ReEBOV test made in West Africa

B.The PCR-based test

C.The fingerprick test

D.How to diagnose the Ebola

2、According to the passage, which of the following is NOT true of PCR-based tests?

A.They must be done in the laboratory.

B.They take more time than the ReEBOV test does.

C.They use the blood drawn from a patient’s arm.

D.They can discover proteins made by the body as a physical reaction to an Ebola infection.

3、The word “quarantined” in line 6, paragraph 2, can be replaced by_______.

A.promised

B.protected

C.kept separate from others

D.kept to themselves

4、According to the passage, all of the following are true about the ReEBOV testEXCEPT______.

A.it could help to control a widespread outbreak of Ebola

B.it looks for the presence of the virus’s genetic material

C.it is a rapid antigent diagnostic test

D.it should be used as soon as possible

5、It can be inferred from the passage that______.

A.the ReEBOV test is not completely accurate

B.the ReEBOV test has been given permission to be used at all times

C.an Ebola patient must be put in quarantine for a few days before treatment

D.both the ReEBOV test and the PCR-based test collect the same data

6、(B) The email that arrived in Richard Young’s inbox in October 2013 was polite but firm. The writer was part of a group of researchers who “are conducting a study to investigate the reproducibility of recent research findings in cancer biology.” A paper that Young had published in Cell in 2012 on how a protein called c-Myc spurs tumor growth was among 50 high-impact papers chosen for scrutiny by the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology. The group might need help with materials and advice on experimental design, the message said. Young wrote back that a European lab had already published a replication of his study. No matter, the project’s representative replied, they still wanted to repeat it. But they needed more information about the protocol. After weeks of emails back and forth and scrambling by graduate students and postdocs to spell out procedures in intricate detail, the group clarified that they did not want to replicate the 30 or so experiments in the Cell paper, but just four described in a single key figure. This past January, the cancer reproducibility project published its protocol for replicating the experiments, and the waiting began for Young to see whether his work will hold up in their hands. He says that if the project does match his results, it will be unsurprising—the paper’s findings have already been reproduced. If it doesn’t, a lack of expertise in the replicating lab may be responsible. Either way, the project seems a waste of time, Young says. “I am a huge fan of reproducibility. But this mechanism is not the way to test it.” That is a typical reaction from investigators whose work is being scrutinized by the cancer reproducibility project, an ambitious, open-science effort to test whether key findings in Science, Nature, Cell, and other top journals can be reproduced by independent labs. Almost every scientist targeted by the project who spoke with Science agrees that studies in cancer biology, as in many other fields, too often turn out to be irreproducible, for reasons such as problematic reagents and the fickleness of biological systems. But few feel comfortable with this particular effort, which plans to announce its findings in coming months. Their reactions range from annoyance to anxiety to outrage. Cancer geneticist Todd Golub of the Broad Institute in Cambridge has a paper on the group’s list. But he is “concerned about a single group using scientists without deep expertise to reproduce decades of complicated, nuanced experiments.” Golub and others worry that if the cancer reproducibility project announces that many of the 50 studies failed its test, individual reputations will be damaged and public support for biomedical research undermined. “I really hope that these people are aware of how much responsibility they have,'' says cancer biologist Lars Zender of the University of Tübingen in Germany. Timothy Errington, the reproducibility effort’s manager at the nonprofit Center for Open Science in Charlottesville. Virginia, knows the scrutiny has unsettled the community. But, he says, the project is working hard to make sure that the labs have all the details they need to match the original studies. The effort will ultimately benefit the field, he says, by gauging the extent of the reproducibility problem in cancer biology.What is the passage primarily about?

A.Cancer biology

B.Cancer reproducibility

C.Research findings in cancer biology

D.Papers on reproducibility

7、The phrase “hold up” in line 2, paragraph 3, is closest in meaning to______.

A.persist

B.continue

C.come to a halt

D.prove effective

8、What can be said about the reproducibility project?

A.It planned to examine the 50 most influential papers in Cell.

B.It was very particular about the papers on cancer reproducibility.

C.It lacked skills required in the lab.

D.It faced a negative reaction.

9、The author gives synonyms for which of the following words?

A.announce

B.replicate

C.gauge

D.scrutinize

10、According to the passage, the purpose of the reproducibility project is most likely_______.

A.to find fault with the scientists in cancer biology

B.to copy the experiments of other scientists in cancer biology

C.to know how serious the reproducibility problem is in cancer biology

D.to benefit the field of cancer biology

参考答案:

【一、阅读理解题】

1~5 CDCBA 6~10 BDDB

如果这样刷题不过瘾,请立即安装APP刷题,历年真题、高质量模拟题应有尽有。

英语专业自考 APP
随时随地搜题刷题学习课程
找答案微信小程序
免下载,即可体验强大的搜题神器
小程序
上学吧找答案
APP下载
上学吧题库APP
TOP